Time difference between solar wind and sunlight. After 1700 AD, there appears to be a time difference of about 60 years.

Abstracts
1. Modern warming is caused solely by rising sunlight
2. Solar wind and sunspots are nearly synchronous
3.Sunlight lags behind solar wind and sunspots by about 60 years

The above is examined in more detail in the Japanese article.
https://mogura-no-mogu.blog.ss-blog.jp/2024-08-08-kikouhendou-yoriyoi-kaisetsu-001


Professor Papa mogu.

Hello to everyone in the world.


Greenland 2000 Year Temperature Variability Data and Solar activity variation data(Carbon14) overlaid on

The solar activity variability data based on radiocarbon 14 accumulated in tree annual rings is of paramount importance in the study of climate change.
Any research that does not take this into account is meaningless.

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────



Mix of solar activity(Carbon14), global average temperature, and CO2 variability over the past 1000 years

We must realize that solar wind plasma is ahead of solar wind and sunlight is about 60 years behind.

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────


Proprietary mix of solar activity change data with IPCC assessment report data

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────


Sea level rise over the past 20,000 years and Solar activity over the past 12,000 years

Sea level height and solar activity can be said to coincide.

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────


Composite solar activity data with NASA published data



source data
https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/features/GlobalWarming/page3.php
Imagination is required in any profession.
Those who argue about global warming based on this data alone are seriously lacking in imagination.

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────


The Milankovitch cycle theory is delusional.
https://co2coalition.org/facts/408/


Solar activity was highly variable. If the Milankovitch cycle theory is true, then the solar activity variation data should not have experienced large fluctuations.
It is a ridiculous idea to begin with. I can't believe that anyone would seriously discuss it.




──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

NEW